Holla Bend

January 27, 2025

The intense cold (highs below freezing) that has stricken most of the south began to lessen over the weekend and Melissa thought it a good time to get out of the house with the kids for a drive.  While the motivation was to “just go”, we also wanted to see a birding site.  The Sequoya Wildlife Refuge is only about 90 minutes west, but we have not had much luck finding birds in the winter.  Lake Fort Smith is an hour north and has good fishing in the cove, but we have never caught much from the shore.  I put in a little work while Melissa searched for a new birding site.  What she found was about 2 hours away near where she spent her college years.  This sounded like a possibility (and promised a trip to her favorite burger joint).  We packed up the kids, got gas and aired up the tires that had been deflated by the cold, and took off for Holla Bend National Wildlife Refuge.

When I looked online, I found Holla Bend National Wildlife Refuge is a 7,055-acre (28.6 km2) site located 5 miles (8 km) south-east of Dardanelle, Arkansas.  The refuge is bounded on one side by the Arkansas River and on its others by an oxbow lake that was formed in 1954 by the Army Corps of Engineers during efforts to straighten the river navigation channel.  The resulting island was transferred to the US Department of the Interior in 1957 for a wildlife refuge.  The refuge provides habitat for migratory waterfowl, indigenous endangered species, other resident wildlife, and offers interpretation and recreation to the public.  The area is a year-round sanctuary for the 236 species of birds, tree frogs, and the American alligator.  Migratory fowl following the Central and Mississippi flyways stay in the refuge during the winter months, including 14 species of ducks and 4 kinds of geese, with as many as 100,000 there at once.  Winter migratory neotropical songbirds use the refuge as a rest stop during their long journey to and from Central and South America and during the spring and summer migratory birds use the refuge for breeding and nesting.  I anticipated birds.

Last year I purchased an Interagency Lifetime Pass from the US National Park Service so we cruised past the Holla Bend information center without stopping.  We turned around realizing we did not know where we were going without a flyer.  As we got into the refuge, we saw large flocks of American Robin (Turdus migratorius) on the road between the trees and European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) passing among the harvested grain fields.  Along the oxbow we found a flock of mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and a flock of ring-billed gull (Larus delawarensis) along the river.  The best find however, was totally unexpected.  We stopped to admire a herd of 20 does and fawns racing across the far end of a harvested field.  Then I noticed what I thought was a group of black vultures (Coragyps atratus) about 300 yards (274 m) out.  When I focused my camera, I realized this was a flock of wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) feeding in the field.  It turned out to be a great day.  And we topped it with a great burger.

Thoughts: When we stopped at the Holla Bend information office a sign listed the daily hours along with the caveat of “Closed when we are not here”.  They were not there.  The Wildlife Refuge System is the US’s largest network of lands and waters dedicated to wildlife conservation, but it is facing a staffing crisis.  The Refuge System has lost over 800 permanent positions since fiscal year 2011, resulting in a 27% loss in capacity.  No national wildlife refuge is fully staffed, and more than half have zero staff on-site.  Much of the system is unprotected due to the lack of law enforcement officers.  This shortage impacts critical volunteers by a lack of staff supervision or infrastructure.  We need to invest in this system and prioritize staffing to ensure the future of this network and the wildlife it protects.  Act for all.  Change is coming and it starts with you.

Traction

January 14, 2025

Yesterday I decided it was time to get out into the weather and take the kids for a walk.  I decided to go to the lake as it was more open and had a better probability for the parking lot to be cleared by road crews.  The temperatures in the morning were below freezing (-0C) but were set to warm up to 40F (4.5C) by the afternoon.  I did have two concerns.  The first was the possibility for windchill which would negate any increase in temperature.  I decided to dress for the cold.  That meant a pair of long johns under my sweatpants.  Then a tee shirt, a long sleeve undershirt, and a long-sleeved thermal undershirt.  I topped this off with a light ski jacket.  The first concern was covered.  The second concern was the potential for ice and snow on the spits we walk at the lake.  The kids have been romping in the snow in the side yard, and I knew this would not be their concern.  That is different for me and was my reason to shovel over the weekend.  Melissa was a runner when we met and one of her first Christmas presents was cold weather gear for running in Kansas.  That meant running gloves, hand and foot warmers, and a set of spikes in a rubber harness.  The spikes were billed as “everyday traction aids”.  The spikes should provide the traction I needed to walk the kids.   

When I looked online, I found Merriam-Webster defines traction in several ways.  The first definition (and applicable for me) is “the adhesive friction of a body on a surface on which it moves”.  A variation of this meaning says traction can refer to “a pulling force exerted on a skeletal structure (as in a fracture) by means of a special device” (splint).  A second definition is “the force exerted in the act of drawing or being drawn”.  The third meaning took a different approach with “the support or interest that is needed for something to make progress or succeed”.  This indicates something “gains traction” as people begin to accept and/or adopt an idea or methodology.  Finally, traction refers to “the drawing of a vehicle by motive power”.  Here a tractor is something that pulls something else.  This is often a piece of farm machinery or the part of a big truck that includes the engine and the cab.  The word tractor comes from the Medieval Latin “traction”, or from the Latin “trahere”.  The first known use of traction in English occurred in 1608, in the meaning defined by the second sense.

I was intrigued by the spikes guarantee to provide traction as I walked the kids.  After I bought them, Melissa had never had an occasion to use them.  They sat (in the original package) in my closet along with our shoes for 15 years.  When we pulled into the lake for our walk, I found the parking lot was generally clear of ice and snow.  Even the roads leading out to the end of the spits were clear, even though the grass on either side was snow covered.  I left the traction spikes (still in their packaging) in the car and started on our hike.  The temperature was higher than forecast at 45F (7C) and my decision to bundle against the cold seemed unnecessary.  Neither of my concerns were warranted.  I was toasty in my layers and the snow and ice were gone.  However, I was not anticipating the mud.  The ground was mostly frozen, but my four-wheeler buddies had been taking laps in the snow and over the roads.  As we walked the spits, Loki’s legs and underbelly quickly became covered in mud.  We took most of our laps circling the parking lot.  Luckily there was enough snow on the grass to wash Loki off before I let him back into the car.

Thoughts: This was one of the (rare) occasions where I over planned for the cold and loss of traction.  Even though I did not need all the extra layers, it was nice to be warm and snug while we walked.  The traction aid I bought for Melissa went back into the closet next to my shoes to wait for another day.  I do not know if my over planning can be accredited to experience or unwarranted caution as I age.  As a Boy Scout our motto was “Be Prepared”.  That is still a good motto for hiking, camping, and even for life in general.  Act for all.  Change is coming and it starts with you.

Shovel

January 13, 2025

We are now well into recovery from the snowstorm that dumped 9 inches (23 cm) of snow on our town before the weekend.  That gave me a day to recoup as I had no intention of getting out in the snow.  I did take time Saturday afternoon to shovel the portion of the patio that was being trampled by the kids at play and myself as I stocked the feeders.  It was in the 30’sF (0’sC) during the day and I knew if I did not remove the snow, it would become a sheet of ice.  That would make it harder to remove and slicker as I walked (it did not seem to bother the kids either way).  I always had a snow shovel when I lived in Kansas and used it several times over the winter.  The shovel was something I did not bring when we moved to Arkansas.  While it usually snows once over the winter, it is rarely deep enough to worry about shoveling.  Since we got deep snow, that meant I got to dig out using a square 8-inch (20cm) shovel rather than the 18-inch (46 cm) snow shovel I am used to.  If you do the math, you know it took twice as long to shovel my patio than if I had the proper equipment.        

When I looked online, I found whether to shovel the snow or not is one of the biggest questions for homeowners.  Questions arise about who is responsible, how much you should shovel, and what to do with the snow you shovel.  This was a moot point as I began to shovel my patio.  The city could care less if I shoveled my back yard or not, but the front yard is a different situation.  The news stations all suggested you move your vehicles off the street to allow access for the street crews.  They also suggested if you did not move them you may end up buried in the drift the plows create as they scoop the snow onto the easement.  I knew I had responsibility for my sidewalk when we lived in Kansas, but we do not have a sidewalk in our cul-de-sac, so I was free from any responsibility there.  Like my patio, I knew clearing my drive was more for my personal convenience than for others.  What I found online is that the rules and regulations on whether you shovel snow vary from state to state, and some cities, towns, and homeowners’ associations (HOA) have their own rules about how to shovel snow.  Like most US states in the south, Arkansas currently has no laws on snow removal.

Knowing it was not my responsibility to shovel snow did not help with maneuvering my driveway and front walk.  We had several packages delivered after the snow let up and the mail and delivery people had forced their way through the snow.  On Sunday I took on the larger task and prepared to shovel the front of our house.  The winds had died down and the temperatures were now comfortably in the high 30’sF (0’sC) so it was ideal weather to shovel.  I took my little flat shovel and scooped the snow into my yard on both sides of the sidewalk and driveway.  I was glad I decided to shovel when I did because the snow was sitting on an inch (2.5 cm) of slush.  The temperatures were predicted to again drop into the low 20’sF (-0’sC) and the slush was going to freeze.  This would be compounded by the footsteps that compact the snow and aid in the freezing.  When I woke up this morning the snow was completely gone and the cement dry.  I am glad I decided to shovel.

Thoughts: As I continued to shovel my driveway, I noticed I was the only one on my cul-de-sac who was doing so.  The snow was only on their drives and streets, and once you got out of our subdivision the roads were clear.  I was not required to shovel, but I felt better knowing I was protecting myself and any delivery people that might venture onto our property.  Every time I shovel snow (Kansas or Arkansas) the same thing happens.  As my neighbor struggled to get out of the cul-de-sac, he stopped and jokingly asked if I would shovel his drive next.  I declined.  While major climate events can be devastating, they seem to bring people together.  Surviving a climate event gives humans a sense of camaraderie that may not have been there previously.  It would be better to connect prior to an event rather than because of one.  Act for all.  Change is coming and it starts with you.

Snowstorm

January 10, 2025

Our first snowstorm of the new year started yesterday and continues this morning.  The kids have come a long way since their first snowstorm 2 years ago.   Zena had moved tenuously through the flakes giving them their sniff evaluation before finally deciding they were ok to play in.  Loki missed that storm, and this was his first real opportunity to snuffle.  We let them outside as the flakes were coming down yesterday.  Zena immediately went on patrol prancing up and down the perimeter of the fence.  Loki was more discriminating.  Sensing “something” beneath the inches of snow he began to snuffle and dig.  This morning brought on the “zummies”.  Both dogs raced through the snow, only stopping long enough to get into a quick fight before getting back to zooming.  Since it is below freezing (32F or 0C) I did not keep them outside too long.  I also felt obligated to stand and watch to see how they were doing.  That probably limited their time, as I get cold fast.

When I looked online, I found the snowstorm that moved through Arkansas overnight dumped nearly 15 inches (38 cm) of snow in some parts of Arkansas, roughly 8 inches (20 cm) across the Little Rock metro area, and 7 to 10 inches (18 to 25 cm) in the areas around my town, according to the National Weather Service in Little Rock.  We average around 1 inch (2.5 cm) of snow annually.  Entergy reported 8,496 customers without power as of 7:30 am, with most outages in southwest Arkansas.  The Electric Cooperative of Arkansas reported 5,390 customers without power.  Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport/Adams Field (east of Little Rock) reported there had been 36 flight cancellations as of 8:30 am Friday.  Airlines are challenged by deicing planes in the snowfall, delaying morning departures.  Airfield crews worked all night and into the morning to plow and sweep the snow from the main runway, taxiways, and air carrier ramp, airport spokesman Shane Carter said in Friday’s news release.  Other parts of north-central Arkansas are expected to receive 8 to 12 inches (20 to 30.5 cm) and Northern Arkansas is forecast for 5 to 7 inches (13 to 18 cm) of snow, and some in the area could get more.  We still have flurries expected to last until the afternoon. 

Another reason to let the kids out in the snowstorm this morning is the combined group of red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus), common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), and a few brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) that descended.  I do not mind feeding these birds, but when they descend, they quickly devour everything and drive the smaller passerines off by their presence.  The blackbirds are skittish and just letting the kids into the yard makes them retreat to the surrounding trees.  The smaller birds return despite the kids’ presence.  Collectively, blackbirds may be described as a “murder” when they are seen flying together or perched on a tree branch.  A “cloud” is a poetic term used as they fly together in formation.  A “merle” is an older term used to describe the group as they forage for food on the ground while a “colony” is used to describe a group nesting together.  Finally, a “congregation” is used to describe a group of blackbirds gathered in one area.  The different names indicate the level of human interest in their various activities.

Thoughts: As the snowstorm winds down, I begin to reflect on getting out.  Tad Sours, director of communications for Washington County said, “All that we really ask from the public is if you don’t have to get out in it, don’t . . . give plenty of room to our road crews.”  Still, I did not make the pre-snowstorm dash for milk, bread, and toilet paper like most of the area’s residents.  Global warming means extremes of both heat and cold, and opposite events at the same time (like a snowstorm and wildfire).  Make a difference NOW, not later.  Act for all.  Change is coming and it starts with you.

Birds 2024

January 04, 2025

I am a little later than usual, but it is again time to recap my annual birder list. Once more I saw a number of red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) on the power lines going to and from town but this year I was unable to actually get a picture, so they were not added to my count. I was unable to take my usual trip to the wildlife area this year and so missed out on any of the birds I might have seen there. The end of year presence on my feeders was good as the cold weather brought the small Passerines (sparrows and finches), although the larger birds (cardinals and jays) were mostly absent. I cleaned out the bluebird (Sialia sialis) house last week. One of the squirrels who frequent the feeders has taken to gnawing on the entrance, so I opened it to check if everything was ok. It was fine but I cleaned the nest and debris in preparation for the next nesting season. BTW: for those who read last week’s blog (Gaggle) a group of squirrels is called a “dray” or a “scurry”.

All that said leads up to the “great reveal” concerning my birder totals for 2024. You may recall I recorded 26 species in my first year (2020). I got off to a great start in 2021 with 29 species by the end of January and a total of 52 species for the year. During 2022 the sightings were slower, with 44 different species, not counting the six European sightings (50 total?). During 2023 I recorded my lowest number of sightings since my first year, with only 30 species. During 2024 the numbers rose slightly to 39 documented species. Building a fence in the side yard helped as the kids no longer play near the feeders and the birds feel free to come and go more frequently. Still, early morning and early evening are the best times to watch. We also added three new feeders that attach to the glass on the bay window next to where Melissa works. This allows her to watch as the American gold finch (Spinus tristis) and Dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis) as they battle for feeding rights.

As I pulled onto the entrance road to the lake to take the kids for a walk yesterday, I caught sight of a large bird perched in the trees. I drove by as the bird turned and flashed the unmistakable white head of a bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). I slowed and then pulled over as soon as I (no shoulders). I walked back the 1/4 mile (400m) scanning the trees and hoping to be able to get a photo for my birding list. Unfortunately, the eagle had moved on and was now out of sight. When we began our walk out onto the first spit of land, I heard the call of a red-bellied woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus). I scanned the trees along the road and caught sight of the bird high among the branches. I pulled out my phone to take a photo but again, by that time the bird was gone. That made two birds I usually only see a couple of times a year and I had missed documenting them both. These were part of the many birds I have seen but not photographed over my last five years of birding. The official Cornell Lab of Ornithology bird list guide does not require documentation with a photo to count as a sighting, although that has been my criteria. Perhaps I should rethink.

THOUGHTS: I acquired several new feeders (now 13, plus 9 hummingbird feeders) during 2024. Melissa asked about the cost as she watched me buying seeds and filling the feeders on a daily basis. I tend to buy seeds in bulk, and I only have to restock two or three times a year. Watching the birds (and squirrels) gives us both pleasure. Like my garden and Melissa’s succulents, the expense to feed the birds is well spent. Be sure to mark your calendars for the Great Backyard Bird Count 2025 (February 14 to February 17, 2025). As I mentioned last year, birds are the (literal) canary in the mine shaft (earth) when it comes to gauging the health of our ecosystems. Act for all. Change is coming and it starts with you.

Bigfoot

January 03, 2025

© Provided by the Skamania County Sheriff’s Office

Inside the front section of my local newspaper was a USA Today article on the recovery of two men who had gone missing in a remote forested area of southwest Washington State. The bodies were found on December 28 following a three-day search-and-rescue mission that involved 60 people along with the US Coast Guard. The families of the two Portland, Oregon men had reported them missing around 1 am on December 25th. The Facebook page for the Skamania County Sheriff’s Office (SCSO) wrote a post honoring the rescuers who answered the call on Christmas morning. “Creeks had to be crossed, obstacles climbed, and frozen ground navigated, all while maintaining the safety and well-being of the entire team.” SCSO officials said that both deaths appeared to be due to exposure, and that the men were ill-prepared for the weather conditions they faced. The identities of the two men, aged 37 and 59, have not been released. Officials with the SCSO say the two men had gone into the Cascade Range hunting for Sasquatch, or Bigfoot.

When I looked online, I found Sasquatch, also referred to as Bigfoot, is a large, hairy mythical creature said to inhabit forests in the Pacific Northwest. The creature is featured in both American and Canadian folklore, and since the mid-20th century has grown into a cultural icon. Enthusiasts within the pseudoscience of cryptozoology offer various forms of evidence to prove the existence of Bigfoot, including sightings, photographs, video and audio recordings, hair samples, and casts of large footprints. Scientific consensus is that this is a combination of misidentification, folklore, and hoax, rather than a living animal. Sightings often describe Bigfoot as a large, muscular, and bipedal human or ape-like creature covered in black, dark brown, or dark reddish hair. The estimated height is roughly 6 to 9 feet (1.8 to 2.7 m), but some descriptions have Bigfoot standing as tall as 10 to15 feet (3.0 to 4.6 m). Common descriptions include broad shoulders, no visible neck, and long arms, which skeptics attribute to the misidentification of a bear standing upright. Folklorists trace Bigfoot to a combination of factors and sources, including folk tales and indigenous cultures. Examples of similar folk tales of wild, hair-covered humanoids exist throughout the world.

The origin of the name Bigfoot began in 1958, when a bulldozer operator (Jerry Crew) for a logging company in Humboldt County, California, discovered a set of large, 16 inches (41 cm) human-like footprints in the mud in the Six Rivers National Forest. When Crew informed his coworkers many also claimed to have seen similar tracks on previous job sites and the men began using the word “Bigfoot” to describe the creature. After observing more of these footprints, Crew contacted Andrew Genzoli of the Humboldt Times newspaper. Genzoli interviewed lumber workers and wrote articles about the mysterious footprints, introducing the name “Bigfoot” in relation to the tracks and the local tales. A plaster cast of the footprints was made, and Crew appeared holding one of the casts on the front page of the newspaper on October 6, 1958. The story spread rapidly as Genzoli was contacted by major media outlets including the New York Times and Los Angeles Times, and Bigfoot became the widespread reference to the creature leaving massive footprints in Northern California.

THOUGHTS: While Northern California is arguably the most popular locale for Bigfoot Lore there have been countless sightings up and down the Cascade Range. Skamania County where the two bodies were found has its own Bigfoot tradition. By the 1960’s, there had been so many Bigfoot sightings that Skamania County commissioners passed a law making it illegal to kill, harm, or shoot at a Sasquatch. The act of searching for the creature is referred to as “Squatching”, popularized by the Animal Planet series, Finding Bigfoot. Whether reality, myth, or hoax, Bigfoot is alive and well in the American Northwest. Act for all. Change is coming and it starts with you.

Gaggle

December 30, 2024

The kids were overwhelmed as we took our walk at the lake last week. They had been intrigued in the past by the occasional greater egret (Ardea alba) or great blue heron (Ardea herodias) that spend time in the shallows at the end of the two spits we walk. The kids will stop and even strain on their leash trying to get a better look at these large solitary birds. They were not prepared for the mass of birds we encountered on this occasion. The herons had flown away as the kids approached, but the Canada geese (Branta canadensis) stood their ground. Both Zena and Loki hesitated in the face of this loud and raucous group of birds. It was not until the kids composed themselves and began to move forward that the group decided they wanted no part of these two large dogs (Canis familiaris). This gaggle of geese took flight and moved to the safety of the water.

When I looked online, I found a gaggle of geese occurred in English print in Julia Berners book, “The Book of Hawking, Hunting and Blasing of Arms” in 1486. Geese are called a “gaggle” because together they are noisy and rowdy. Little is known of Berners, and much of what is known cannot be verified with certainty, but she is thought to be the earliest female author writing in the English language. Based on her last name, scholars suggest that she was either the daughter of the courtier Sir James Berners or wife to the lord of the manor of Julians Barnes, and she was high-born and well-educated. Since she was most likely brought up at court, she would have hunted and fished with the other fashionable court ladies. It is generally believed that she entered the monastic life and became the prioress of Sopwell Nunnery near St Albans. Berners seemed to retain her love of hawking, hunting and fishing, and her passion for field sports, leading her to write her treatise on hunting and others. These treatises are some of the earliest extant writings of their kind and include remarks on the virtues of environmental conservation and on etiquette for field sports. These concepts would not become commonly accepted for hundreds of years after the publication of these treatises. She is also remembered as one of the first authors (of either sex) to write on angling.

A gaggle is just one of the 165 collective nouns (a “naming word for groups of things) for groups Berners defines in her publication. A group of owls (Order: Strigiformes) is called a parliament, possibly attributed to the idea that owls are considered intelligent and wise. A group of wildebeests (Genus: Connochaetes) is called a confusion. This could be due to the huge numbers of animals that in the annual Great Migration and the resulting confusion and noise that happens when the animals migrate. A group of lemurs (Superfamily: Lemuroidea) is called a conspiracy. Lemurs are social animals and live in communities of around 10 to 25 members who often work together (conspire) to outwit predators using a technique called “mobbing”. A group of hippopotamuses is called a bloat. Hippos live in groups of 10 to 20 females and one male, and bloat may refer to their large, bloated bellies. Finally, a group of wild cats is called a destruction. Feral cats can be territorial and fight to protect their territory, and when a group of feral cats get together, they can become destructive.

THOUGHTS: Canada geese thrived around the golf courses I played in Salt Lake City and would form into a large gaggle around the water hazards. The geese were generally docile as they sat on the lawn or swam in the ponds. The problem came when you hit your ball in their midst, when they cackled and blustered a warning. One even decided my ball was her egg and made an aggressive defense. Animals form groups for protection and defend their territory against predators. Humans use the same tactic and form resistance movements against tyrants or marauders. Like a gaggle of geese, we are stronger together. Act for all. Change is coming and it starts with you.

Cute

December 26, 2024

It is the end of the year and that means the internet is barraging us with stories of “The Best” and “The Worst” of everything from sports (Pommel Horse Guy) to music (Gabriela Ortiz, “Kauyumari”) to food (Sour Patch Oreos) . . . (ad nauseum). One story that caught my attention was about the animals that filled 2024 with sadness, intrigue, and delight. Sadness came with the tragic end of Flaco, the escaped Eurasian eagle owl who appeared to die in a building collision in February. Our intriguing was piqued by the Governor boasting of killing her misbehaving dog and a presidential nominee who deposited a dead bear cub in Central Park and cut the head off a dead whale found of the beach. The delight was the previously mentioned slippery potato named after a pork meatball (Moo Deng) who rocked the internet and drove cosmetic influencers for several months. Then there was Terrance the octopus who had been identified as male until “he” laid 50 fertilized eggs. The online audience watched the heroic efforts to keep the fragile hatchlings alive, even as there is only about 1% chance of survival for the hatchling to grow to .4 inches (10 mm) in the wild. It seemed what held media interest best was stories of cute baby animals learning to survive in the world.

When I looked online, I found there are two ways (of course) to answer why we find baby animals so cute. The proximate answer requires you to single out the features of animals that make them cute versus ugly, and often merge them into a general explanation. Why are baby ducks cute and baby parrots ugly? A proximate answer might involve fur, size of the head or the eyes, length of the limbs, all of which help us define cute. The ultimate answer is perhaps an evolutionary one. Is there an evolutionary reason why we find some features attractive and others repugnant? Answering these sorts of questions is the foundation of evolutionary psychology, and while the answers may be elusive (or even beyond our grasp), we still like to think about them. The reasons we find animals cute or ugly come from criteria that have evolved to help us evaluate members of our own species. Baby animals are cute because natural selection has given babies of some species traits that remind us of a human infant.

Some of these ideas could be tested to determine whether there is a commonality between features we see as ugly or cute in animals and compare them with similar features in humans. Regardless, it is important to remember things are not innately ugly or cute. Features humans find ugly may be exactly what attracts the female to the male of another species. As Darwin recognized, our tastes may be no less evolved than our brains or our bodies. For humans, there is no reason for why the signs of age make someone innately less attractive than the freshness of youth. It may be that our standards of beauty have evolved to reflect candidates for mates and older people are seen as less attractive because they are near or past the age of reproduction. This is a preference that could have been instilled in our ancestors by natural selection. Still, beauty in nature is not innate but evolved and our biology co-evolves with our tastes. Only in animal breeding is this reversed, where human desires allow us to sculpt the features and appearance regardless of the environment.

THOUGHTS: There are some babies (animals and humans) that are so ugly that they are cute. In Planet of the Apes, astronaut George Taylor is preparing to leave and thanks the chimpanzees who help him escape. He overcomes his repulsion and turns to Doctor Zira (female) saying, “Doctor, I’d like to kiss you goodbye.” Zira responds, “All right, but you’re so damned ugly.” Humans need to look beyond the traits that make one superficially cute and find the inner beauty that is only revealed when we get to know each other. Act for all. Change is coming and it starts with you.

Recapture

December 23, 2024

Ariana Gomez for The New York Times

Back in 2022 I blogged on growing battle surrounding carbon recapture in the US’s Mississippi River Chemical Corridor, commonly known as Cancer Alley. While critics acknowledged the process worked, they objected to the pollution caused by the facility itself, and the energy required to power the equipment. Today, my NY Times feed reported that more than 2 years later over 1,000 big companies have pledged to eliminate their carbon emissions over the next few decades, and part of those efforts came from paying for carbon dioxide removal. During 2024, Microsoft, Google, and British Airways were among the companies that committed a total of US$1.6 billion to purchase carbon removal credits. This is up from less than US$1 million in 2019, and it is believed this will grow to US$10 billion during 2025, and reach US$1.2 trillion by 2050. While huge sums of money are being dedicated to the emerging field, these projects will not have a meaningful effect on global temperatures anytime soon. There are only a few dozen operational facilities today that capture only a trace of carbon emissions. It is estimated that if 100’s of more such plants were built it would only recapture about 1% of the worlds annual carbon dioxide emissions.

When I looked online, I found that while there are several ideas for geoengineering plans and technologies designed to cool the planet, carbon dioxide recapture is attracting the big money. Investors believe while this will have a negligible short term impact on temperatures, it will begin to make a difference as emissions fall and the technology becomes more powerful. While some carbon polluters have committed to reducing carbon emissions, more are opting to continue to pollute and instead paying for carbon recapture credits. The US government is supporting the recapture movement through the Inflation Reduction Act that has tripled tax credits for capture and storage of carbon directly from the atmosphere. This 2021 bipartisan bill included US$3.5 billion to build four demonstration projects.

Pulling greenhouse gases out of the air is expensive and currently costs as much as US$1,000 per ton to capture and sequester carbon dioxide. Analysts say the price would need to drop to US$100 a ton for the industry to be viable. Damien Steel, chief executive of the carbon recapture firm Deep Sky, says, “This isn’t a market. A market means liquidity, repeatability, standards. We have none of that here.” As the NY Times reported, the industry is still creating a form of gold rush as investors readily fund new companies hoping that some of their bets will pay off. Many scientists and activists say the most effective way to combat global warming is to rapidly phase out oil, gas, and coal, as it is the burning of these fossil fuels which heat the planet. Former Vice President Al Gore, co-founder of Climate Trace, said, “We need to obey the first law of holes. When you’re in one, stop digging.”

THOUGHTS: Carbon recapture is only the latest technological innovation humans employed to try and resolve a problem of our own making. As an archaeologist the irony was not lost on me that I was digging through the trash dumps that the next culture had buried as they created a new living space on the remains of the past. When the pollution became too great, people would move to the next pristine site and begin again. The problem now is the pristine places are diminishing, and the polluted locations are broadening. This is particularly evident as our land, water, sea, and air are polluted on a globalized scale. If we do not “stop digging” our holes, the earth will be left for the next interplanetary archaeologists to dig. Act for all. Change is coming and it starts with you.

Chipmunk

December 20, 2024

One of the casualties of building my raised beds was the wood pile located along the back fence. This wood had been stacked when Melissa and her parents used the raised fire pit that sits adjacent. We have not used the fire pit (or wood) in the six years we have been back, and it was beginning to deteriorate. This was the perfect wood for the bottom layer of the raised beds. As I transferred the wood to the beds I encountered a variety of critters. There was a small Texas Brown Snake (Storeria dekayi texana) hiding in the pile and toward the bottom I encountered several of the invasive earth worms (Lumbricus terrestris) that repopulated North America along with the European colonists. As I continued to work a small furry critter darted out of the wood pile and into the refuge in the next yard. had noticed the chipmunk on several previous occasions as it foraged beneath the bird feeders.

When I looked online, I found the eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus) is a species endemic to eastern North America and the only living member of the genus Tamias. The name probably comes from the Ojibwe word “ajidamoo”, translating as “one who descends trees headlong.” The species was first described by Mark Catesby in 1743 and was eventually classified as Sciurus striatus by Linnaeus (Latin, “striped squirrel”). The scientific name was changed to Tamias striatus (“striped steward”) by Johann Illiger in 1811. The chipmunk reaches about 12 inches (30 cm) long including its tail and weighs 2.3 to 5.3 ounces (66 to 150g). It has reddish-brown fur on its upper body and five dark brown stripes contrasting with light brown stripes along its back. The fur of its lower body is lighter with a tawny stripe running from its whiskers to below its ears and light stripes over its eyes. The eastern chipmunk has two fewer teeth than other chipmunks, four toes on each front leg, and five toes on the hind legs. There is no external difference in appearance between the sexes except for genitalia. The eastern chipmunk lives in deciduous wooded areas and urban parks throughout the eastern US and southern Canada, preferring rocky areas, brush, log piles, and shrubs for cover.

I had not seen the chipmunk since removing the wood pile and forgot about it. Over the last month Loki has been going crazy every time we have let him out back. From the frantic way he was acting I figured there was some critter living under the ramp off our back door. When I mentioned this to Melissa, she said she thought she had seen a rat (Rattus norvegicus) scurry under the porch when she let the kids out in the morning. I poked around with a stick to see if I could scare the rat out, but it never budged. Last week the mystery was solved. I was up early and let the kids out and saw a flash as something tried to speed from beneath the feeder back under the ramp. I recognized the animal as a chipmunk and tried to keep Loke from grabbing it. It finally reached safety as Loki scratched, sniffed, and whined around the ramp. Melissa now makes a point of making noise before she lets the kids into the yard, giving the chipmunk time to scurry back to safety.

THOUGHTS: I was relieved when I found out we had a chipmunk rather than a rat. I have liked chipmunks since I encountered them as a boy around the picnic sites in the Rocky Mountains. Even though rats and chipmunks are both rodents, these smaller cousins seem cute and innocuous while rats seem menacing. Perhaps it is a throwback to the Black Plague that ravaged Europe and was blamed on the fleas carried by rats. I read an article last week suggesting it was more likely it was the human fleas that spread the disease rather than the rats (Europe was not very sanitary). Humans tend to have similar reactions when encountering other cultures. If they are welcoming or meek they are deemed ok, even if often taken advantage of. If they stand up or hold their ground, they are deemed a threat and often eliminated. Whether it is rats, chipmunks, or other humans, perspective changes how we treat them. Act for all. Change is coming and it starts with you.